The need for censorship from obscene material

This section needs additional citations for verification.

The need for censorship from obscene material

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.

Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.

History of censorship in New Zealand : About NZ Classification : OFLC

December The 18th century book Fanny Hill has been subject to obscenity trials at various times image: Federal obscenity law in the U. Former Justice Potter Stewart of the Supreme Court of the United Statesin attempting to classify what material constituted exactly "what is obscene," famously wrote, "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced California established a three-tiered test to determine what was obscene—and thus not protected, versus what was merely erotic and thus protected by the First Amendment.

Delivering the opinion of the court, Chief Justice Warren Burger wrote: The basic guidelines for the trier of fact must be: The classification of "obscene" and thus illegal for production and distribution has been judged on printed text-only stories starting with "Dunlop v.

Attorney General of Com. Another was "Kaplan v. Department of Justice formed the Obscenity Prosecution Task Force in a push to prosecute obscenity cases.

The publisher pleaded guilty. Some states have seen their sex toy bans ruled unconstitutional in the courts.

Other sample model essays:

The last such prohibition, in Connecticut, was overturned judicially in Eventually the California Supreme Court declared the literature to be of "redeeming social value" and therefore not classifiable as "obscene". Because the poem "Howl" contains pornographic slang and overt references to drugs and homosexuality, the poem was and is frequently censored and confiscated; however, it remains a landmark case.

Pacifica external link better known as the landmark " seven dirty words " case. In that ruling, the Court found that only "repetitive and frequent" use of the words in a time or place when a minor could hear can be punished.

Henrythe Oregon Supreme Court ruled that the Oregon state law that criminalized obscenity was an unconstitutional restriction of free speech under the free speech provision of the Oregon Constitutionwith the ruling making Oregon the "first state in the nation to abolish the offense of obscenity.

California - the currently-binding Supreme Court precedent on the issue - the Court ruled materials were obscene if they appealed, "to a prurient interest", showed " patently offensive sexual conduct" that was specifically defined by a state obscenity law, and "lacked serious artistic, literary, political, or scientific value.

The need for censorship from obscene material

Standards superseded by the Miller Test include: If material has a substantial tendency to deprave or corrupt its readers by inciting lascivious thoughts or arousing lustful desires. British common law, cited in Regina v.

LR 3 QB - overturned when Michigan tried to outlaw all printed matter that would 'corrupt the morals of youth' in Butler v.

State of Michigan U.

Essay, term paper, research paper: History Essays

United States U. Material is "utterly without redeeming social importance". Ohio US - famous quote: But I know it when I see it. Adds that the material possesses "not a modicum of social value". Attorney General of Massachusetts, U. Supreme Court similarly has had difficulty defining the term.

Californiathe court defers definition to two hypothetical entities, "contemporary community standards" and "hypothetical reasonable persons". The courts and the legislature have had similar problems defining this term because it is paradoxical, and thus impossible to define.

Because the term "obscenity" is not defined by either the statutes or the case law, this law does not satisfy the Vagueness doctrinewhich states that people must clearly be informed as to the prohibited behavior. Because the determination of what is obscene offensive is ultimately a personal preference, alleged violations of obscenity law are not actionable actions require a right.

Because no actual injury occurs when a mere preference is violated, alleged violations of obscenity law are not actionable actions require an injury. Obscenity laws remain enforceable under Miller despite these criticisms.

Book Censorship – System

Some states have passed laws mandating censorship in schools, universities, and libraries even if they are not receiving government aid that would require censorship in these institutions.

Twenty more states were considering such legislation in —Defining Censorship. DEFINITIONS of CENSORSHIP "Supervision and control of the information and ideas that are circulated among the people within a society. Chronology of developments (in Australia, Canada, NZ, UK, USA) This section contains a chronology of developments since regarding governmental policy on Internet censorship and freedom of expression rights in Australia, Canada, NZ, UK, and the USA.

The FCC and Freedom of Speech.. The First Amendment, as well as Section of the Communications Act, prohibits the Commission from censoring broadcast material and from interfering with freedom of expression in broadcasting.

Because censorship laws enacted to combat obscenity restrict freedom of expression, crafting a legal definition of obscenity is a very difficult proposition. Obscenity Law - Wikipedia The FCC may revoke a station license, impose a monetary forfeiture, or issue a warning if a station airs obscene, indecent, or profane material.

The Offensive Publications Act was New Zealand's first censorship legislation Customs was regulating the importation of indecent material into New Zealand as early as , but the first censorship legislation was not enacted until Technology Support for your Mac Environment. Our Apple Authorised consultants are ready to offer support on resolving issues from server connectivity, mail server, calendar issues, font management, software instability or simply giving your Mac workplace a "once over".

The Issue of Obscenity